Why referees didn't call offensive pass interference penalty on key George Kittle TD vs. Cowboys | Sporting News

featured-image

On National Tight End Day , of course, George Kittle had to score. As the 49ers faced 3rd-and-goal from the Cowboys' two-yard line midway through the third quarter, quarterback Brock Purdy found Kittle in the flat for an easy touchdown to extend the lead to 10. While the referees initially called wide receiver Chris Conley for offensive pass interference, they ultimately picked up the flag, allowing the touchdown call to stand.

It's fitting that George Kittle scores on #NationalTightEndsDay 🔥 @gkittle46 📺: #DALvsSF on NBC/Peacock 📱: Stream on #NFLPlus pic.twitter.com/tOnCd7dPL2 The Sporting News breaks down why Kittle's touchdown was allowed.



George Kittle touchdown vs. Cowboys, explained Initially, it appeared as though wide receiver Chris Conley illegally picked Cowboys defensive back Donovan Wilson, which would've negated the touchdown and backed the 49ers up 10 yards. However, head official Bill Vinovich announced that there was no penalty on the play, giving Kittle the touchdown.

This drew two flags, but was later determined to not be offensive pass interference pic.twitter.com/4BLt2s0Nef On the NBC broadcast, former official Terry McAulay explained why the play was not offensive pass interference.

"It looks like the defender, one, steps in front of the receiver trying to run a route, and second, the other defender engages him," McAulay said. "This is not offensive pass interference, this was correctly picked up." However, Cris Collinsworth did not agree with the call.

"If that's going to be legal from here on out, we're gonna have a lot of people taking acting classes," he said. Terry McAulay explained why this was correctly called as NOT offensive pass interference. Cris Collinsworth was skeptical, thinking it will lead to "A lot of people taking acting classes.

" pic.twitter.com/FMcBors1LH The pick play is already one of the more controversial plays in the NFL, and this interpretation of the rule only adds a layer of confusion.

.