1 week Ago By Moneycontrol
The Border-Gavaskar Trophy series between India and Australia has been overshadowed by contentious umpiring decisions, with players and pundits raising questions about the use of technology. Day 1 of the fifth Test in Sydney featured two particularly controversial calls involving third umpire Joel Wilson, who had already faced scrutiny for his on-field decisions during the Melbourne Test. One incident earlier in the day favored Virat Kohli, but the spotlight fell on a later decision where Wilson adjudged Washington Sundar caught behind after Australia reviewed the on-field not-out ruling by umpire Saikat Sharfuddoula.
The dismissal involved a short delivery from Australian captain Pat Cummins that Sundar attempted to pull. Also Read - 'This is bulls**t': How Steve Smith, Marnus Labuschagne antics led to Shubman Gill's wicket in Sydney - Watch The decision-making process became contentious when replays and the Snickometer were reviewed. The technology detected a spike as the ball passed close to Sundar's gloves, but one frame appeared to show no contact, while the next displayed a spike.
Despite the ambiguity, Wilson deemed the spike conclusive enough to overturn the on-field decision. Sundar, visibly stunned, briefly protested before leaving the field, dismissed for 14 runs. His departure was met with boos from the Australian crowd.
The decision sparked widespread debate. Former England captain Michael Vaughan expressed shock at Wilson's ruling, while former India batter Robin Uthappa was more critical. "I'm sorry, but that's a terrible decision!" Uthappa exclaimed.
"There was a spike, sure, but the side angle showed clear space between the ball and the glove. Decisions like this should benefit the batter." In contrast, former umpire Simon Taufel defended Wilson, explaining the rationale behind the decision.
"Joel Wilson based his decision on the Snickometer showing a spike when the ball was under the glove," Taufel told Channel 7. "According to the protocols, that's enough to consider it conclusive evidence of contact. The third umpire was well within his rights to make that call.
" The debate continues, highlighting the challenges of balancing technology and human judgment in cricket. Earlier in the day, third umpire Joel Wilson faced scrutiny for his decision to rule Virat Kohli not out following an Australian appeal for a catch in the slips. Kohli, who came to the crease after opener Yashasvi Jaiswal's early dismissal, edged a delivery to second slip.
Steve Smith dived to his right, getting his fingers under the ball but failed to secure it cleanly. As the ball flicked into the air, it was eventually caught by Beau Webster. Wilson reviewed multiple replays and determined that the ball had touched the ground during Smith’s initial attempt to control it.
This decision sparked dissent among Australian greats, including Justin Langer and Ricky Ponting, who questioned the umpire's interpretation of the evidence. India's innings concluded at a modest 185, with the Australian pace attack, led by Scott Boland, capitalizing on the green-tinged Sydney pitch to dismantle the batting lineup..
