Universities Shutter DEI Programs in Climate of Fear

In response to President Donald Trump’s executive order directing “the termination of all discriminatory programs” associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, many universities are shuttering programs even marginally associated with the progressive slogan, according to The Wall Street Journal. The reason: universities do not want to lose valuable federal funding in response to a DEI program that runs afoul of the order, even if the university did not intend for it to. Arizona S

featured-image

In response to President Donald Trump ’s executive order directing “the termination of all discriminatory programs” associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, many universities are shuttering programs even marginally associated with the progressive slogan, according to The Wall Street Journal . The reason: universities do not want to lose valuable federal funding in response to a DEI program that runs afoul of the order, even if the university did not intend for it to. Arizona State, Michigan State, and North Carolina State Universities have all halted various DEI efforts to protect themselves against a backdrop of seemingly blunt and overly broad measures to root out social justice activism from institutions by the Trump administration.

These measures included an offer of a buyout for federal employees, creating a culture of fear around questioning Trump’s ideas in executive agencies, and a temporary $3 trillion funding freeze . The culture of fear extends to campuses as well. Will Creeley, legal director of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, shared his concerns about possible retaliation against campus leftists by the Trump administration with The New York Times .



“I think you’ll see professors investigated and terminated,” said Creeley. “I think you’re going to see students punished, and I think you’re going to see a preemptive action on those fronts.” Some of Trump’s directives are directly tied to grants, such as the provision that universities must not have “programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable federal anti-discrimination laws” if they want to receive grant money.

Universities received a whopping $247 billion in federal dollars in 2024, mostly in the form of grants meant for specific research purposes. Jacob Schwartz, the associate director for cancer training and education at the University of Arizona, expressed concern that “very skilled” graduate students who may not get federal funding for research cannot be easily replaced. He stressed that unique science “dies” under those conditions.

U of A’s science program for Native American high-school students was already put on the chopping block by the new presidential administration. D.C.

lawyer Scott Goldschmidt is asking universities to look at how other universities adapted to laws in conservative states that have banned DEI initiatives to figure out how to move forward..