These Trump Administration Picks Have Ties To Project 2025

Trump has already named several people tied to Project 2025 to his administration, even after he disavowed the extreme policy agenda.

featured-image

Topline President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is considering naming Project 2025 architect Russell Vought to a high-level administration post, ABC News reported Tuesday, after Trump has already named several people involved with the right-wing policy agenda to serve in his next White House—despite disavowing it before the election. Key Facts Surprising Fact Trump is appointing people linked to Project 2025 despite transition team co-chair Howard Lutnick vowing ahead of the election to “blacklist” anyone involved with the project from serving in the administration. “Heritage, because of Project 2025, is radioactive,” Lutnick told The New York Post before the vice presidential debate in October.

“As in, none, zero, radioactive. So that’s a clear position.” The Trump transition team has not yet commented on its appointees’ ties to Project 2025.



What To Watch For In addition to Vought, the Trump transition team is considering naming several other people with Project 2025 ties to the administration, ABC reports. Gene Hamilton, who authored Project 2025’s chapter on the Justice Department, is reportedly being considered for a legal role within the agency. His chapter calls for a “top-to-bottom overhaul” of the DOJ and decries the agency’s “radical Left ideologues who have embedded themselves throughout its offices and components,” with proposals that include ending FBI efforts to combat misinformation, eliminating FBI offices, enforcing the death penalty and ensuring the DOJ acts more in line with Trump’s policies and conservative agenda.

Trump officials are also reportedly considering appointing Reed Rubinstein as general counsel for the Treasury Department, who is affiliated with Trump adviser Miller’s America First Legal organization and formerly served as deputy associate attorney general, general counsel for the Education Department, and as senior adviser to the treasury secretary. Rubinstein is listed as a contributor to Project 2025 and is credited as helping with the agenda’s chapter on the State Department. What Does Project 2025 Say? Project 2025 proposes a sweeping overhaul of the executive branch, including eliminating some agencies entirely—like the Departments of Education and Homeland Security—and broadly replacing career civil servants with political appointees.

The agenda makes a number of recommendations that are broadly in line with policies Trump has already proposed, such as eliminating climate change and transgender rights efforts, barring the teaching of “critical race theory” and pulling out of international organizations that don’t serve the administration’s interests. It also goes beyond Trump’s proposals, with calls to outlaw pornography, abolish all student loan forgiveness, impose baseline tax rates and overhaul the Federal Reserve through methods like taking away the government’s control over the nation’s money or returning to the gold standard. It also proposes banning TikTok and restricting abortion nationally by stripping federal approval for abortion drug mifepristone and using the Comstock Act to ban the mailing of abortion pills, which conflicts with Trump expressing support for TikTok and claiming he would leave abortion to the states.

Will Trump Follow Project 2025? Trump disavowed Project 2025 and denied having any connection to it during the election, though he has a number of ties to the Heritage Foundation beyond the people he’s now hiring for his next administration. Trump has praised the Heritage Foundation’s work in the past, and the organization has boasted that Trump followed many of its policy recommendations during his first presidential term. It ultimately remains to be seen if he will adopt any of Project 2025’s proposals that are different from the ones he’s already proposed himself .

The Trump transition team and Heritage Foundation have also not yet commented on whether Trump intends to follow Project 2025’s playbook for his first 180 days in office. Unlike the organization’s broader policy agenda, this playbook has not been publicly released, with Vought saying in the Centre for Climate Reporting’s secret footage that the information in it is “closely held” and he believed it would be possible to get it to Trump should he win the election. Tangent While Project 2025 has garnered more publicity, multiple outlets report a different right-wing organization, America First Policy Institute , is actually driving Trump’s policy agenda.

That organization is chaired by Linda McMahon, also the co-chair of Trump’s formal transition team, and includes numerous former Trump officials, including Ratcliffe, former adviser Kellyanne Conway and former acting Homeland Security director Chad Wolf. The policy organization, which has reportedly been crafting executive orders for Trump, pushes a conservative policy agenda but is less extreme than Project 2025, and does not call for banning abortion entirely or eliminating federal agencies. Key Background Project 2025’s policy agenda initially came out last year, part of what the Heritage Foundation has said is a long tradition of crafting policy recommendations for incoming Republican presidents that dates back to Ronald Reagan.

While Project 2025’s policy agenda has gained the most attention, the effort also includes a LinkedIn-style database of potential federal employees and training programs for them, though Heritage declined to comment to Forbes on if the Trump transition team is using its recommendations to staff the next administration. Project 2025 gained attention earlier this year as Democrats repeatedly highlighted it during the election as a key reason to oppose Trump, emphasizing its extreme policies and tying Trump to the agenda. Trump publicly opposed the agenda as it gained notoriety, claiming in July he has “nothing to do with them,” has “no idea” who’s behind the plan and finds some of its ideas “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.

” His campaign adviser Chris LaCivita also denounced it, calling the effort a “pain in the ass,” before Lutnick claimed he would blacklist its members from the next administration. Further Reading.