In a majority verdict, the Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the which granted Indian citizenship to immigrants who came to Assam between January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971. A five-judge Constitution bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud said the Assam Accord was a political solution to the problem of illegal migration. Section 6A was inserted in 1985 into the Citizenship Act as a special provision to deal with the citizenship of people covered under the .
The CJI upheld the validity and said the magnitude of influx of migrants in Assam is higher as compared to other states considering the smaller land size and the detection of foreigners is an elaborate process. Besides, Justice Surya Kant, and Justices M M Sundresh and Manoj Misra, held that Parliament had the legislative competence to enact such a provision. The majority verdict held that the cut off date of March 25, 1971 for entry into Assam and granting citizenship is correct.
Justice J B Pardiwala, however, dissented and held Section 6A as unconstitutional. The All Assam Students Union, which spearheaded a six-year-long agitation against illegal immigrants in Assam in 1979-85, welcomed the judgment upholding the validity of Section 6A of Citizenship Act. AASU described the judgment as “historic” while the original petitioner who challenged the provision of the law termed the ruling as unfortunate.
.
Top
SC upholds Act that grants citizenship to Assam migrants
Dissenting judge held Section 6A of Citizenship Act as unconstitutional