2 weeks Ago
“Of all the rights that an accused person has, the right to be represented by counsel is by far the most pervasive, for it affects his ability to assert any other rights he may have.” — United States v. Cronic, 1984.
Frank Zarro is the principal of Society Impact in Portland. He works with local, state and federal government officials and not-for-profit organizations on public policy formation and initiates programs addressing economic, environmental, social and criminal justice issues. March 18 marked the 63rd anniversary of one of the Supreme Court’s most famous and impactful decisions, Gideon v.
Wainwright . This landmark decision asserted that criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney must be provided with one by the state in which they are charged, as per the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The story, unfortunately, did not end with Gideon.
Since the decision, the fight for the right to counsel has continued. In the decades following the decision, much of the country has failed to meet its promise and the courts have gradually weakened the Gideon mandate. Maine’s public defense crisis has attracted national attention .
We are the only state that relies almost entirely on private attorneys to represent low-income people accused of crimes. This has led to a constitutional crisis that has snowballed for decades. Many thousands of Mainers unable to afford private counsel have been made to wait months in jail while they wait to be assigned an attorney from the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services, a roster of private attorneys who are overworked, understaffed, and do not receive proper training.
The situation got so bad that in 2022, the ACLU of Maine sued the state in Robbins v. Maine Commission on Indigent Legal Services . Earlier this month, a Kennebec County Superior Court judge ordered that by April 3 , defendants held for more than 14 days without being assigned a lawyer must be released from custody, and those who have not been assigned one after 60 days must have their cases dismissed.
This situation is the direct result of the state failing to perform a job it is constitutionally required to do. This is a perfect demonstration of why well-funded public defense systems are necessary for the health, integrity and efficiency of state legal systems, as well as for protecting the rights of the most vulnerable members of our society. The right to effective assistance of counsel is particularly precious because it enables the less fortunate to fight for all their other constitutional rights.
The erosion of the right to counsel is not just a matter of individual rights; it represents a broader, systemic threat to the health of democracy itself. The Dobbs decision overturning the reproductive rights found in Roe v. Wade was a sobering reminder that judicial precedent and the rights we have come to rely on should not be taken for granted.
The right to counsel is spelled out clearly in the Sixth Amendment, “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to [...
] the Assistance of Counsel for his defence,” and yet the Supreme Court did not affirm this until nearly 173 years after the ratification of the Bill of Rights. Even after Gideon, low-income defendants have been and continue to be deprived of this basic structural right. The rights that we enjoy as Americans are more vulnerable than we often think.
Lawyers are essential for the preservation of liberty and a robust public defense bar is the only way to ensure equal justice for all. Maine officials have an opportunity to reverse the state’s low standing on public defense and to create a unique, independently financed and operated public defense system. The Maine Legislature should begin the work of creating an independent authority, separately run and financed through social impact bonds purchased by the public and conditioned on successful outcomes.
Social impact programs have been employed in the United States since 2005 and have consistently demonstrated successful fiscal and public benefit outcomes. Through them, we can reduce crime, save taxpayer expenditures, increase our tax revenues, decrease reliance on social service programs, strengthen individuals, families and communities and end cycles of incarceration and the school-to-prison pipeline. We believe it’s important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers.
At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It’s a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. Read more.
.. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
For those stories that we do enable discussion, our system may hold up comments pending the approval of a moderator for several reasons, including possible violation of our guidelines. As the Maine Trust’s digital team reviews these comments, we ask for patience. Comments are managed by our staff during regular business hours Monday through Friday and limited hours on Saturday and Sunday.
Comments held for moderation outside of those hours may take longer to approve. By joining the conversation, you are agreeing to our commenting policy and terms of use . More information is found on our FAQs .
You can modify your screen name here . Show less Please sign into your Sun Journal account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe .
Questions? Please see our FAQs . Your commenting screen name has been updated. Send questions/comments to the editors.
.
