On food, it’s not Trump we should worry about

With Donald Trump’s recent victory, headlines have been filled with warnings about the “end of democracy,” leading many Canadians to focus on what the next four years might hold. It’s true that the U.S.

has just elected its first convicted felon as president, raising questions about the future. But for those of us concerned with Canada’s agri-food sector, food security, supply management and the well-being of our farmers, the reality may be less about doom and more about data. First, let’s examine food inflation during Trump’s first term.



Back in 2016, when Trump was initially elected, the political climate was similarly intense, with talk of tariffs, renegotiated trade deals, and U.S.-centric policies.

When Trump took office, food inflation in the U.S. was at minus-four per cent — a level that may sound advantageous, but negative inflation in food prices often discourages corporate investment and stalls innovation.

Though food inflation eventually hit four per cent during his first term, it mostly stayed within a manageable range, averaging between 1.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent.

Despite fears, no tariffs affecting Canada’s food supply chain were ever imposed. Then came the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Trump’s flagship trade deal, which reshaped North American commerce. Ratified in 2020, the agreement has led to a surge in Canada’s agri-food exports to the United States, climbing nearly 57 per cent since 2020 to reach almost $60 billion last year.

Under the Obama administration, around 48 per cent of our agri-food exports went to the U.S., but today, nearly 60 per cent flow south.

This dependency on the U.S. is both a blessing and a curse — while our agri-food sector benefits from access to the vast American market, it also leaves Canada’s economy more vulnerable to U.

S. policy shifts. Trump, with his America-first approach, is acutely aware of this dynamic.

His policies brought Canada closer commercially to the United States, especially in the agri-food sector. Additionally, Trump successfully pressured Canada to concede on supply management, allowing more U.S.

market access for products like dairy. But make no mistake — under his second term, further market access will likely be granted to American producers, and Canadian taxpayers will end up subsidizing these sectors even more. While supply management boards may frame these payouts as “compensation” for hypothetical losses, the reality is that they’re subsidies prompted by quota recalibrations, plain and simple.

Yet the real challenge lies in our ability to keep Canada’s agri-food sector competitive. Trump’s 2.0 agenda promises to reduce energy costs, cut red tape, lower taxes, and inject additional financial support through a colossal Farm Bill nearing $2 trillion.

Since 2019, Canada’s wholesale food prices have risen almost 40 per cent faster than those in the U.S., putting Canadian producers at a distinct disadvantage.

If Ottawa doesn’t take immediate steps to address competitiveness, Canadian grocers may increasingly turn to cheaper American imports to keep prices in check. In the end, while Trump’s return may prompt changes, Canadians should focus on Ottawa’s actions — or inactions — in supporting our agri-food sector. Trump’s policies may bring more American products to our grocery stores if we don’t shore up our competitive standing.

Rather than fearing a distant White House, Canadians might be better off scrutinizing Parliament Hill. The bottom line? Trump’s re-election doesn’t signal the end of the world, and any uncertainty can be balanced by looking at the data. The real worry is not Washington, but our own government’s commitment to ensuring the health of Canada’s agri-food sector.

.