McLaren lose F1 appeal over Norris penalty

A dispute over the penalty handed to title-chasing Lando Norris led to a complaint - since dismissed - and renewed focus on the role of Formula One's stewards.

featured-image

Amid an unexpectedly tight championship battle between Max Verstappen and Lando Norris, their teams brought the fight to the Mexico City Grand Prix over an officiating dispute in last week's race. McLaren lodged a complaint into the penalty Norris received last week at the US Grand Prix - a step in trying to get it overturned and put three-time reigning world champion Verstappen back within his reach. The appeal was denied late on Friday night.

Norris received a five-second penalty for passing Verstappen off the track late in the race in Austin, Texas. The two were racing for third at the time, and the penalty gave the final podium spot to Verstappen. The change in position widened Verstappen's lead to 57 points headed into Sunday's race at Mexico City, and there are only five races remaining to decide the title.



Norris has maintained he did nothing wrong and, along with many other drivers, argued that Verstappen should have been penalised for his defensive driving. "He did what he thought was right, and I did what I thought was right. I still disagree, and as a team, we disagree," Norris said.

"It is something I am sure we will discuss as it has been a big talking point since last weekend. A lot of other drivers didn't agree with it, teams didn't agree with it." The same stewards who levied the penalty at the USGP heard the appeal via video conference late Friday afternoon.

Seven-time champion Lewis Hamilton seemed to side with Norris, claiming Verstappen has routinely received favourable treatment from the stewards. "I mean, it's always been a gray area. That's why he's got away with it for so long," Hamilton said.

"They probably need to make some adjustments for sure. We do have inconsistencies weekend in, weekend out, obviously, depending on which stewards are there. "And as a sport, we do need to level up on all areas," he continued.

"We look at, like, other global sports, they have full-time refs for example, and I'm sure that wouldn't be a bad thing for our sport." The situation is so tense between the drivers and the FIA, the regulatory body for F1, that George Russell said a driver-only meeting was planned for Friday evening. Among the topics is the idea of hiring permanent stewards who regulate every grand prix on the F1 schedule.

Russell also received a five-second penalty in Texas for forcing Valtteri Bottas wide, which he isn't fighting. "I thought my penalty was harsh, but probably correct," Russell said. "Looking at Lando's, I think that was probably correct as well, but Max should probably have got a penalty for running off the track.

" Russell is a director of the Grand Prix Drivers' Association and said the drivers had agreed to meet privately following their regularly scheduled briefing. "Between us, we'll talk with the FIA and understand their viewpoint first," Russell said. "And then we can judge.

At the end of the day, the stewards are doing the best job they can. They're trying their hardest, and they do have a set of guidelines which they follow. We've spoken about consistency in the past, the only way you can have consistency is if you have the same stewards at every single race weekend.

"And at the moment, they are very experienced, but they are here as almost volunteers," he continued. "It is not a professionally paid job, and if you look at football as an example, even though there is still controversy, a referee, they are professionals and that is their full-time job.".