2 weeks Ago
Since 1952, no resolution has been brought against Vice President of India since Rajya Sabha chairperson never indulged in politics, said Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge on Wednesday, a day after opposition moved a no-confidence motion against Jagdeep Dhankhar accusing him of 'the partisan conduct' during the functioning of the Upper House of Parliament. “The politics has taken precedence over rules in Rajya Sabha , The chairman has indulged in partisan behaviour. His conduct has been contrary to post's dignity and he targets opposition leaders and often praises the government of the day,” Kharge said, as reported by news agency PTI.
The 60 Rajya Sabha members representing the Congress-led INDIA bloc said they condemned 'the partisan conduct' of Dhankhar, which, they said, is 'unbecoming of High-Level Constitutional Authorities' expected to act in accordance with and in furtherance of the principles enshrined in the Constitution of India. ‘Like school headmaster’ “The RS chairman acts like school headmaster and gives sermons to experienced opposition leaders while stopping them from speaking,” Kharge said adding that the biggest reason for disruptions in Rajya Sabha is chairman himself. “He's working as government spokesperson,” the Congress chief said.
The motion will likely be taken up in the next session by the Rajya Sabha. According to Article 67 (b), a motion for the removal of the Vice President from his office requires a 14-day notice of intent on the part of members of the Rajya Sabha who support the resolution. The ongoing winter session is scheduled to end on December 20.
"As Chairperson, the manner in which Shri Jagdeep Dhankhar conducts parliamentary affairs of the Rajya Sabha is extremely partisan. It is a matter of record that Shr i Jagdeep Dhankhar has repeatedly interrupted members of the opposition while they are speaking, unfairly used privilege motions to silence leaders of the opposition, and openly delegitimised dissent with respect to the actions of the Government in the utmost disparaging manner," reads the motion..
