2 weeks Ago
If there's one antidote to today's digital imaging with its instant gratification and AI-powered editing trickery, it's analog. And if you want a double dose of the old school, a fully manual rangefinder, such as the Leica MP, will do the trick. Part of Leica's famed M-mount, the MP isn't as old as it looks, being released as recently as 2003, and it's one of few Leica cameras still being produced today and is therefore available new.
It's arguably the that you can buy new today, but like most Leica's, its price is eye-watering, being available from the Leica stores and leading retailers for $5,995 / £,5080 / AU$10,190, and that's without a lens. I had the MP with the 28mm f2 Summicron-M APSH lens which is around the same price as the camera. Gulp.
Suppose it's the retro camera experience you're after, and the same 35mm film format hits the spot. In that case, you can find alternative analog cameras elsewhere, secondhand, for a mere fraction of the cost of a Leica MP. You don't even need to buy analog to bag the retro look, even the likes of , one of our favorite .
But Leica is more than just the retro look. It's an aspiration. That famed red dot means something, whatever depth the admirer's connection is.
In the case of the Leica MP, it also means a premium "Handmade in Germany" analog camera that runs as smooth as butter. As a rangefinder, the MP is an altogether different camera experience to your or one of the . Learning the is necessary; how shutter speed, aperture, and the ISO of the loaded film interplay.
You can download a free light meter on your phone to take a light reading and adjust shutter speed or aperture accordingly based on the film's ISO, or purchase a dedicated light meter if you want to avoid your phone altogether and be assured that you've bagged the correct brightness in your photo, even if you won't truly know until the developed film is returned. (The MP does also have an LED gauge built into the viewfinder that indicates how much you need to brighten or darken your exposure settings based on its evaluative metering.) Beyond the exposure triangle, it's the manual focus experience of a Leica rangefinder, such as the MP, that is as challenging as it is addictive.
This is a far cry from 2024's best autofocus systems – there's no rushing with a rangefinder, and together with its lens system that's limited between focal lengths of 21mm to 135mm, it's unsuitable for many genres of photography. You won't be able to nail sharply focused, shallow depth of field portraits of people or animals on the move, unless you get really, really lucky. Outside of working with near-infinity focusing and a closed aperture, say f/11, where ultimately everything is just about in focus, your subjects will need as much patience as you while you manually rock the focus back and forth to line up the split image in the marked out central area of the viewfinder to nail sharp focus.
Taking a picture with a rangefinder is slow, purposeful, and frustrating but ultimately a wonderful creative process for those who persevere. It's not a camera for all the time, but it is a camera that could just renew your love for photography. Sadly, however, with the Leica MP, most people are priced out of enjoying the experience.
The Leica MP was launched in 2003 and is one of the few Leica analog cameras that is still available to buy new. On the Leica store, it costs $5,995 / £,5080 / AU$10,190. Lens choice is decent, if costly, with the lower end of the price range close to the price of the MP camera itself.
There are third party lens makers such as Thypoch that have created Leica M-mount lenses that cost a mere fraction of the price. with a number available for under $1,000 / £700. The MP is also compatible with a host of Leica accessories, ranging from leather cases to viewfinders that are dedicated to specific lens focal lengths.
Leica cameras are expensive, but the build quality of these "Handmade in Germany" devices is undeniable. Every mechanical component runs as smooth as butter, from the film crank to move onto your next photo, to the film rewind mechanism once the roll is done. You'll need to insert a tiny CR 1/3N battery to power the camera's evaluative exposure metering, which is displayed in the viewfinder as a too-bright / too-dark scale and is linked to the ISO setting on the camera's rear ISO dial (the new digital rangefinder's design pays homage to this).
However, as a fully manual camera, you'll need to adjust the shutter speed and aperture yourself. I always use a separate light meter with a Leica just to be doubly sure I've set the exposure correctly. But you'll need to insert a roll of 35mm film first.
Leica's design ethos here is simple and reliable; a fully metal twist lock on the underside must be unscrewed to open up the camera's underside, and you remove the entire bottom plate to gain access to the film's holder. Inserting the film thereafter is a tad fiddly but in truth, once you've done it a couple of times, it's pretty easy. I only tested the Leica MP with a 28mm f2 lens, which again, is a gorgeous bit of kit, offering a generous manual focus grip, handy focus distance scale, and an aperture ring.
With Leica you get the whole package; a lens and camera built to high standards and with a complimentary aesthetic. There's little to say about the camera's external controls. You've got the shutter speed dial on the top, the beautiful film crank that reveals its brass innards through the scuffs picked up over time and heavy use, a shutter button that can accept a screw-in cable release, plus the ISO dial on the camera's rear.
The aperture is adjusted on the attached lens. For me, it's the experience of manually focusing with a rangefinder that is everything about the MP: it's as frustrating as it is addictive. For all the will and the practice in the world, you won't be able to nail sharp focus on a moving subject when focusing closely and with a wide aperture and therefore shallow depth of field.
Sure, you can improve your hit ratio and speed at which you can obtain sharp focus, but ultimately, the Leica MP is a camera that slows you down, and in today's fast-paced world, it's cathartic. If you're taking portrait pictures, too, that extra moment it takes to get your MP's settings correct can open up your subject as they relax and give you a window to their soul – you're in it together. Or, the slow process just makes them feel super awkward instead, or you miss the moment.
It can go either way. One benefit in choosing the MP over another Leica is that it's still available new, and with that comes certain reassurances that you may not be afforded when buying secondhand should you run into any issues. However, I wouldn't expect that of the MP – it's a super-reliable camera that should last you a lifetime.
Naturally, the quality of the photos produced by an analog camera is determined by the lens attached, your shooting technique, and, of course, your film choice. The Leica MP enjoys a range of excellent albeit eye-wateringly expensive lenses, like the 28mm f2 Summicron-M ASPH that I had for this review. If money is no object, you can pick up a range of Leica M prime lenses that cover the focal range of 21mm to 135mm.
Next time I use a Leica analog camera, I'd really love to try a 50mm f/1.4-type lens and some of the other lenses for portraits, but the wide angle lens I had for testing is similar if a tiny bit tighter to the field of view of your phone's main camera and an excellent documentary lens. Here lies the 'Leica quality' that fans talk about.
Sure, you'll struggle to beat Leica's sharpness in the analog game, but if you're expecting the clarity you get from one of today's , you might have to think again. One thing that digital can try with all its might yet never quite achieve, however, is the film look. You aren't buying an analog Leica for its outright image quality over a digital counterpart such as the .
No, you're buying it because it's film that you want to explore, including its imperfect quality. Plus, it's a rewarding hobby, if you can stomach the ongoing costs of film and development. There are very real limits to the Leica MP, namely its maximum shutter speed which is just 1/1000sec.
If you're shooting in bright light and with a wide aperture – like I wanted to shoot at f2 with the 28mm lens – you'll need an ISO 100 film or even slower. However, ISO 400 is a more versatile film speed if you're going to be shooting in mixed lighting. Once the film roll is inserted, you're locked in, you can't switch ISO for every photo like you can with a digital camera.
Buy it if...
Don't buy it if...
Leica loaned me the MP together with the 28mm f2 Summicron-M ASPH lens for two weeks, during which time I photographed everything from sweeping vistas to busy London street scenes. I have shot with both color and black and white film, usually sticking with versatile ISO 400 films. I sent the films to a lab to be developed and was provided with standard-quality digital scans to assess image quality.
.
