1 week Ago
Legislation proposed by Sen. Jm Risch, R-Idaho, and Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash.
, is designed to protect the four lower Snake River dams from removal. The Northwest Energy Security Act directs the federal Columbia River power system to operate in alignment with the “2020 Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision,” which found that the dams should not be breached. “The lower Snake River dams are indispensable to the northwest, and efforts to breach them are profoundly misguided,” Risch said in a press release.
“These dams provide reliable, clean hydropower while supporting critical transportation, agriculture, and irrigation that sustains our region.” “This legislation upholds the Lower Snake River dams as a vital piece of infrastructure for Central Washington and the Pacific Northwest,” Newhouse said in the release. The 2020 record of decision was the result of a “peer-reviewed, science-based process” that found the dams and their benefits should be protected, said Sen.
Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, another sponsor of the bill, in the press release. Sens. Steve Daines, R-Mont.
; Tim Sheehy, R-Mont.; John Barrasso, R-Wyo.; and Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.
; and Reps. Cliff Bentz, R-Ore.; Russ Fulcher, R-Idaho; and Michael Baumgartner, R-Wash.
also supported the legislation. The dams have long been the target of environmental groups and tribes that have wanted to remove them, saying the dams are threatening endangered wild species of salmon. Salmon populations were originally driven down by the influx of settlers in the late 1800s, prior to the dams’ construction.
About 2.3 million salmon and steelhead migrate up the Columbia River each year, the Northwest Power and Conservation Council recently reported . That’s an improvement since the 1990s, but still below the recovery goal of 5 million fish.
About 56% are estimated to be hatchery-raised fish; the goal is to propagate more wild fish. Most agricultural stakeholders cite similar fish declines in other rivers without dams, and the unknown effects in the ocean. They’re concerned about possible negative effects to the environment and economy if the dams are removed.
“We’re obviously very pleased to see (the bill’s) reintroduction from our champions in Congress,” said Anthony Pena, government relations manager for the Pacific Northwest Waterways Association. “I think there’s potential, but it’s as clear as mud what’s going to happen with anything in Congress, let alone this bill.” It’s too soon to tell what kind of effect the new bill would have, agreed Clark Mather, Northwest RiverPartners executive director.
“Administration transition and new Congresses are unpredictable, so we’ll have to see where this goes,” Mather said. “It’s really important to deliver affordable, clean and reliable hydropower to millions of people in the region. We think we have an opportunity to continue to support the fish restoration momentum we see in our rivers, and maintain energy affordability.
” Newhouse has made multiple attempts to draft a bill supporting the dams, said Darryll Olsen, board representative for the Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association. “This has a lot of PR look to it,” Olsen said. He estimates the latest bill is Newhouse’s sixth attempt in five years.
Olsen is not certain how the bill would conflict with a legal settlement agreement signed between the Biden administration, several Tribes and the states of Oregon and Washington in December 2023. He thinks it could conflict with the Stevens Treaties established in the 1850s, which promises reservations for the exclusive use of the tribes and reserving the right to hunt, fish, and conduct other traditional activities on lands off of the reservations, and pre-date all other laws. He’s not sure the Trump administration would want to challenge the treaties.
“I think it’s very unlikely” to move forward, Olsen said of the newest bill. “I don’t recommend that anyone try to take the Stevens Treaties head on.”.
