1 week Ago By Daniel Manning
A Hibakusha Association for Peace and Security representative shares the voices of atomic bomb survivors and discusses defending Japan and nuclear deterrence. Published on By Instead, based on the increasingly severe international context, we advocate for a realistic approach to Japan's security policy. Our organization is comprised of second and third-generation survivors of Hiroshima.
We consider it our mission to articulate and promote a security framework that acknowledges nuclear deterrence as the key factor in preventing the use of nuclear weapons. Our goal is to prevent the mistakes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from happening again. The declaration from the clearly states, "Our security policies are based on the understanding that nuclear weapons, for as long as they exist, should serve defensive purposes, deter aggression, and prevent war and coercion.
" Lessons from current global conflicts show that we can only achieve and maintain peace through painstaking diplomatic negotiations between nations. This process must also include comprehensive national power, including military strength. Japan may need to move beyond the limitations of "exclusively self-defense" and "one-country pacifism.
" Establishing a national military capable of participating in a collective security framework could be a necessary step. This would better align Japan's defense policy with its international commitments. It has been 70 years since the establishment of the (SDF) in 1954.
Despite this, they are still not considered a " force." They are unable to adequately respond to infringements on Japan's , such as territorial violations or the of citizens. This is because Article 9 of the imposes significant restrictions.
These restrictions include the renunciation of military forces and the denial of the right to engage in warfare. We recognize the urgent need to establish a military that can effectively address the severe international environment. Such a military is essential to protect Japan's , security, and the lives and property of its citizens from foreign aggression.
Furthermore, changes may be required to achieve the aspirations stated in the preamble of the Constitution. These aspirations reflect Japan's desire to contribute to peace and maintain an honorable position in the international community. The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed that nuclear bombs are the ultimate weapons of mass destruction.
Their catastrophic effects harm both human health through radiation and threaten the survival of humanity. At the same time, the intensified the arms race. With 's successful development of nuclear arms in 1964, the world entered an era of nuclear proliferation that continues today.
Currently, there are over 13,000 nuclear weapons globally, according to a . Even countries that are not part of the Non-Proliferation Treaty possess nuclear arms, contributing to a dangerously unstable international environment. Nuclear weapons, with their unparalleled destructive power surpassing conventional weapons, are not only used as offensive tools.
They also serve as crucial instruments in reshaping the global order through force. and China's recent diplomatic negotiations offer clear proof of this. Using nuclear capabilities to gain leverage in diplomatic discussions is arguably the real factor contributing to global instability.
Japan, the only country to declare the " ," has relied on the for protection. This extended deterrence, under the strongest nuclear power within the NPT framework, addresses nuclear threats from neighboring countries like China. However, Russian President 's nuclear threats have violated his security assurances.
These assurances state that the five major nuclear powers (the US, Russia, the , , and China) will not use, or threaten to use, nuclear weapons against non-nuclear NPT signatories. By threatening to use nuclear weapons, Russia has also shaken the confidence of non-nuclear NPT countries. As a result, and Sweden have opted to abandon their neutrality in favor of the North Atlantic Trade Organization's ( ) nuclear umbrella.
As long as nuclear weapons exist, Japan cannot avoid preparing national defense measures against nuclear attacks. While Japan's current reliance on the US nuclear umbrella seems unquestionable, can we truly consider it secure? There is no guarantee written in the that the US will always provide protection in the event of a nuclear crisis. Another major issue exists as well.
of the noted that the Japanese government's commitment to the Three Non-Nuclear Principles restricts its options. This adherence limits the effectiveness of US-extended nuclear deterrence. As a result, Japan's security may be compromised in the face of nuclear threats.
Tomiyama explains NATO's nuclear sharing mechanism, which demonstrates the strength of alliance relationships. He evaluates it as contributing to strengthened deterrence. I believe that it is now imperative to promptly advance discussions on Japan-US defense strategies.
This should include the "nuclear sharing" former Prime Minister said should be discussed. In July 2017, the UN adopted the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (hereafter referred to as "the Treaty"). Ever since then, we have expressed opposition to Hiroshima City's request to join the treaty.
We have also raised issues with the mayor of Hiroshima on various occasions. The reason is that there are significant issues that threaten Japan's national security. The biggest issue is that this treaty includes provisions that would immediately nullify the Japan-US alliance, the foundation of Japan's national security.
Our country must confront the new threat posed by the expansion of nuclear arms from foreign nations. Despite being a member of the , Russia launched a war of aggression, deceiving the international community with nuclear threats. Even after the Second Meeting of States Parties (November 27 to December 1, 2023), the Treaty still lacks measures for verifying nuclear weapons disposal.
Moreover, two-thirds of the member states declined to condemn Russia's aggression through UN resolutions. Moreover, not a single nuclear-armed country has joined the treaty. China is rapidly expanding its military power, including nuclear capabilities.
harbors ambitions to dominate the , invade , and seize Japan's southwestern islands. now possesses missiles with a range of 15,000 kilometers and submarine-launched missiles. Japan must recognize that these three nuclear powers threaten its security.
Former General Sadamasa Oue explained that the validity of a nuclear deterrence strategy relies on the fact that nuclear weapons have never been used. He emphasized that this absence of use is the ultimate proof of its effectiveness. In other words, "deterrence" is the result of mutual psychological interaction with a difficult-to-evaluate adversary.
As long as the theory does not collapse (i.e., nuclear weapons are not used), it remains valid.
But this system may be nearing collapse. We must prioritize nuclear non-proliferation and deterrence aimed at preventing conflicts (wars) involving conventional weapons. Now is the time to revise the Constitution to create a normal military that can exercise collective self-defense, moving beyond an exclusively defense-oriented stance.
We at the Hibakusha Association reject notions like "nuclear abolition will lead to world peace" and "Article 9 pacifism is the foundation of peace." Additionally, we must reconsider the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and strengthen deterrence to prevent the use of nuclear weapons. We strongly urge swift action on constructing nuclear shelters, developing dual-use public infrastructure, and securing emergency medical systems and food supplies.
Author: EDITORIAL | Nobel Peace Prize a Reminder of Nuclear Horrors EDITORIAL | Right for Ishiba to Abolish Cooperation Post with Russia INTERVIEW | Ken Weinstein of Hudson Institute on Forging Better Relations in Okinawa Japan: World's Best Travel Destination for 2nd Consecutive Year The Tibet International Communication Center and China's Latest Manipulation Exercise The Only One Solution to China's Current Crises You must be logged in to post a comment You must be to post a comment..
