Exaggerations from Albanese, Dutton lost in Trump’s tariff blitz

featured-image

We take a look at the prime minister’s claim Dutton wanted to end bulk-billing and the Coalition’s claim groceries are up 30 per cent under Labor.

Between Donald Trump’s blitz of , Anthony Albanese’s and the Australian Electoral Commission investigating and , it’s difficult to know where to look since the to call the election one week ago. It’s been seven days of promises and mud-slinging from Albanese and Peter Dutton since then. Here’s the week that was on the campaign trail, fact-checked.

Dutton said on days one and three of the campaign that Australia has become worse off under Labor, noting in on March 28 that “Australians are now paying on average 18 per cent more for rent, 30 per cent more for groceries and over 30 per cent more for power and gas.” Dutton that household grocery bills have swelled by 30 per cent under Albanese’s leadership. But that figure does not align with the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ data, which shows non-alcoholic beverages and food have climbed by almost half of Dutton’s quoted amount, up 14 per cent over Labor’s term.



Greens leader Adam Bandt accused federal Labor of his party’s policy, and he’s broadly right. “Another day and another Greens policy that the prime minister has adopted,” Bandt at a press conference in inner Melbourne’s St Kilda West. “Their first step is to say no, and then they adopt them, and we take that as a really good sign.

” Bandt, alongside Greens Senator Nick McKim, first announced a supermarket price gouging policy, which includes a Prices Commission that would make referrals to the ACCC, early last month. Albanese announced Labor’s very similar plan over the weekend. Speaking from Western Sydney’s Eastern Creek on day three of the campaign, Dutton , saying “people’s power bills have gone up by $1300′′.

Albanese did repeatedly promise in 2022 to slash power bills by $275 a year by 2025, which has not happened. shows the average annual power bill from the 2022-23 financial year to 2024-25 instead increased from $1698 to $2053. That is, however, an increase of $355, not $1300.

Factoring in the estimated average annual power bill for 2025-26 being $2186, that’s still well under $1300 with the increase being $488 since 2022-23. Those national figures do not include areas or types of businesses that may see different results. Part of Dutton’s “positive plan” includes , which he – contrary to what claim – says will lead to lower energy bills.

He has walked back his claim that annual waste from a nuclear reactor , saying instead this week that it . Another way Dutton is proposing to decrease power bills is by , which he claims would bring down wholesale gas prices from roughly $14 to less than $10 a gigajoule. that average prices have been below $14 lately.

Albanese, meanwhile, included a $1.8 billion cost-of-living measure in last week’s budget, on the eve of his election announcement. Labor also plans to , which can cut more than $1000 from the average family home’s annual power bill after a $10,000 to $15,000 fee, pre-installation.

On Sunday, Albanese that a vote for the Coalition was a vote for higher taxes. That claim is premature, because the Coalition could still announce a tax cut policy, and it ignores Dutton’s plan to cut fuel excise for 12 months. “[Dutton] is going to an election not just having voted against our tax cuts this week, he is saying that he will introduce legislation to increase the taxation rates of all 14 million Australians,” Albanese declared on the ABC’s program.

Labor’s reduction of the bottom tax rate to 14 per cent over two years, starting from mid-2026, is only worth at best $10 a week to people earning more than $45,000. It was a surprising element of Jim Chalmers fourth budget, but within a day of its announcement, shadow treasurer Angus Taylor announced the Coalition would repeal the tax cut if elected. Dutton, also on Sunday, said his plan to halve fuel excise for 12 months was superior to the “hoax” of Labor’s tax cut, saying: “[Albanese] is promising 70 cents a day in a tax cut which doesn’t start for 15 months.

I think this prime minister is out of touch with how much pain Australians are feeling.” Albanese on Tuesday in Adelaide, claiming that when Dutton was Minister for Health and Aged Care between 2013 and 2014, there was “$50 billion cut from hospitals, he attempted to introduce a tax every time people visit a GP and ..

. abolish bulk-billing altogether.” Budget documents from 2014-15 show that Dutton did plan to slash hospital spending by $50 billion over the following decade, but his forecast never came to fruition.

In fact, data from the shows hospital spending has consistently increased over the last 12 years, including before Tony Abbott shuffled Dutton out of the health portfolio in late 2014. Dutton did try to introduce a $7 co-payment charge for traditionally bulk-billed services including standard GP consultations, out-of-hospital pathology and imaging services, though after 10 months of back-and-forth, the policy was dumped in March 2015. And many GPs have been charging significant gap fees for consultations during Labor’s time in office.

The Coalition has denied it would cut Medicare or health funding, and has also denied its plan to cut 41,000 public servants would impact frontline services. In February, the Coalition matched Labor’s $8.5 billion boost to Medicare.

This week, the Liberals saying Labor’s claim the Coalition would cut health funding is disinformation – though the figures they use as evidence in their rebuttal are slightly misleading. The ad cites Australian government hospital funding figures to suggest the Liberals gave hospitals dramatically more money when they were last in office compared to Labor. It also points to higher bulk-billing rates in 2021-22 as evidence they will look after Medicare.

The Morrison government did boost hospital funding , with the new Liberal ad comparing the extraordinary pandemic figure with funding under the Gillard government more than a decade ago, when Australia had a smaller population to care for. It has not been adjusted for inflation either. As for the bulk-billing rate figure, it ignores the years-long that largely happened under the Coalition, meaning the bonus for bulk-billing did not keep up with inflation, which soared as the world emerged from the pandemic, causing the rate of free doctor visits to fall sharply early in Labor’s term.

The bulk-billing rate also reflects the number of Australians getting free COVID vaccines, which has subside Dutton has – wages adjusted for inflation – have fallen under Albanese, which is technically correct. According to the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures, real wages have fallen 1.1 per cent during Albanese’s term.

Looking back at real wages under Morrison, however, it’s worth noting real wages fell even more as inflation surged following COVID-19. Under the previous Coalition government’s watch, real wages fell 2.9 per cent.

.