Detention Warrant Issued for Yoon over Martial Law, 1st Issuance for Sitting President

SEOUL, Dec. 31 (Korea Bizwire) — A Seoul court on Tuesday issued a warrant to detain impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol over his botched martial law imposition, making him the first sitting South Korean president to face arrest. The Seoul Western District Court approved a request from the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) [...]The post Detention Warrant Issued for Yoon over Martial Law, 1st Issuance for Sitting President appeared first on Be Korea-savvy.

featured-image

President Yoon Suk Yeol delivers an address to the nation from the presidential office in Seoul on Dec. 12, 2024, in this photo provided by his office. (Image courtesy of Yonhap) SEOUL, Dec.

31 (Korea Bizwire) — A Seoul court on Tuesday issued a warrant to detain impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol over his botched martial law imposition, making him the first sitting South Korean president to face arrest. The Seoul Western District Court approved a request from the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) to issue the warrant against Yoon on charges of masterminding the botched Dec. 3 martial law declaration, orchestrating the insurrection and abusing power, according to sources.



The court also approved a warrant to search Yoon’s presidential residence in Seoul’s Yongsan in connection with the investigation. The CIO filed for the detention warrant after Yoon ignored all three summonses to appear for questioning over the short-lived martial law invocation. CIO officials are expected to visit Yoon’s residence soon to execute the warrant.

A detainment warrant is typically valid for a week. Once Yoon is taken into custody, the CIO is required to decide within 48 hours whether to file for an arrest warrant to detain him further for questioning or release him. In issuing the warrants, the court rejected Yoon’s claims that the CIO lacks jurisdiction over insurrection cases and that the warrant request was therefore illegal.

The court also dismissed Yoon’s claims that he couldn’t attend questioning sessions because arrangements for his personal safety and security detail, as the president, had not been made. However, it remains unclear whether the CIO can detain Yoon, as the Presidential Security Service has blocked investigators from entering both the presidential office compound and Yoon’s official residence to carry out recent court-approved searches, citing military security concerns. Shortly after the court issued the warrant to detain Yoon, the Presidential Security Service said it would take measures to handle the warrant in accordance with legal process.

Although Yoon has presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, by law, the privilege does not extend to insurrection or treason charges. Yoon’s defense team has argued the CIO lacks legal authority to investigate insurrection, a charge for which, in principle, police have investigative jurisdiction under the current system, amended during the previous government. Oh Dong-woon, the CIO chief, has said that, unlike search warrants, a court-issued detention or arrest warrant cannot legally be obstructed, even by the president.

Yoon has been suspended from his duties after the opposition-controlled National Assembly voted to impeach him on Dec. 14 over his imposition of martial law, which lasted six hours before it was overturned by a parliamentary vote. The Constitutional Court has begun proceedings for deliberations to determine whether to remove Yoon from office or reinstate him.

It has 180 days from Dec. 14 to deliver its ruling. (Yonhap).