2 days Ago By Terence P. Jeffrey
Over the past three and a half years, I have advised clients and colleagues to cool their jets about the inevitability of globalist elites succeeding in forcing a rapid, premature transition away from an oil, natural gas and coal-based energy system to one based on subsidized alternatives like wind, solar and electric vehicles. The reason for this advice has been pretty simple: The entire energy-transition initiative is based on politics, not on science, and the political pendulum swings, often quickly and radically. We have already seen that happening in Europe in in Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and to the European Union Parliament.
In all these elections, as well as the coming elections in places like the United Kingdom, France and Canada, overreaching energy and climate policies played a major role in what has amounted to significant voter revolts. In the United States, the complete self-destruction by President Joe Biden in former President Donald Trump on Thursday evening signals an increased likelihood of a looming major pendulum swing come November — one that will have major implications related to energy and climate policies. But less than 12 hours after that debate concluded, the U.
S. Supreme Court in the case, one that will almost certainly become its most impactful decision in recent years. The key element of this decision is the overturning of the so-called , a legal doctrine established by the court in a 1984 case involving the U.
S. oil company . This doctrin.
)
