1 week Ago By Kausalya Rachavelpula
Citadel: Honey Bunny , the Indian spin-off of the Russo brothers’ Citadel, brings a fresh, Bollywood-infused take on the spy thriller genre. Directed by Raj & DK, the series combines gritty action with a quirky narrative, set against the backdrop of 90s Bombay. While the show offers an engaging mix of suspense and humour, it struggles to fully develop its characters and emotional stakes, leaving viewers with an entertaining yet somewhat shallow experience.
STORY Citadel: Honey Bunny presents an intriguing blend of espionage and personal drama, revolving around a set of characters caught in the whirlwind of secret operations, betrayals, and family secrets. Set in the 1990s, the story unfolds across two timelines: the first shows Honey (Samantha Ruth Prabhu) as a struggling actress in Bombay, who is recruited by stuntman Bunny (Varun Dhawan) to participate in a covert mission. The second timeline picks up eight years later, with Honey and Bunny leading separate lives, unaware that they share a young daughter, Nadia (Kashvi Majmundar), who is poised to become the next super-spy.
The narrative moves between personal stakes like Honey's decision to fully commit to the spy world after her cover is blown and action-driven plots involving espionage, secretive organisations, and familial tensions. While the central premise is intriguing, the execution occasionally falters, with some narrative beats feeling overly familiar or underdeveloped. The presence of Nadia creates a sense of predestiny, but this aspect of the story never fully lands, and the drama between the adult characters lacks the emotional depth needed to make their relationships truly compelling.
PERFORMANCES The performances in Honey Bunny are a mixed bag, with standout moments from the cast but also some limitations in character development. - Varun Dhawan as Bunny makes his streaming debut with an assured presence, fitting the role of a tough, morally complex spy. While his physicality works well in the action scenes, Bunny’s emotional journey is underwritten, leaving Dhawan to carry a character that never feels fully fleshed out.
His performance is serviceable but lacks the depth needed to elevate the character beyond a basic spy archetype. - Samantha Ruth Prabhu plays Honey with a mix of charm and grit, but her character's evolution from a struggling actress to a hardened operative lacks convincing emotional transitions. Her dialogue delivery, especially in Hindi mixed with Telugu, feels occasionally forced, though her on-screen chemistry with Dhawan is palpable.
Despite this, Honey never fully resonates as a complex character; her motivations feel somewhat shallow. - Kay Kay Menon as Vishwa, the enigmatic spymaster, is one of the highlights of the series. Menon’s commanding presence and subtle delivery add layers to a character that could have otherwise been a mere villain.
His interactions with Bunny carry weight, and he elevates the show whenever he appears. - Kashvi Majmundar as Nadia, the young daughter with spy potential, is effective in her role. Though her character serves more as a plot device than a fully realised individual, Majmundar brings a refreshing energy to the screen, hinting at the promise of future instalments.
TECHNICALITIES Honey Bunny boasts impressive technical aspects, particularly in terms of cinematography and action direction. - Cinematography by Johan Heurlin Aidt is one of the show’s standout features. The series blends grounded, scrappy action with carefully composed shots, creating a sense of realism amidst the chaos.
The use of single-take sequences in confined spaces, such as cars, safe houses, and palatial interiors, is expertly done, adding a raw, unpolished quality to the action that suits the series’ tone. - Action sequences are another strong point, with Raj & DK steering clear of the overblown set pieces typically found in Hollywood productions. The fights and chases feel gritty and believable, reminiscent of 90s Bollywood action flicks.
There is a clear effort to maintain a sense of authenticity, with tactical gunplay and hand-to-hand combat grounded in a realistic style that makes the action more relatable to the Indian audience. - The production design and costumes effectively capture the period setting, especially in the 90s Bombay sequences. The show's visual aesthetic leans into nostalgic cues, from the gritty streets of Bombay to the tech-heavy espionage setups, adding a sense of familiarity for viewers familiar with the era.
ANALYSIS While Honey Bunny offers a fun ride with its mix of action and Bollywood flair, it struggles to live up to its potential. The series benefits from Raj & DK’s signature quirky sensibilities, yet fails to fully break free from the trappings of a typical spy drama. The concept of a prequel exploring the origins of its central characters is promising, but the execution leaves much to be desired.
The primary issue lies in the underdevelopment of the central characters. Both Bunny and Honey remain somewhat two-dimensional throughout the series, with their backstories and motivations only lightly sketched out. This lack of depth makes it difficult for viewers to fully invest in their journeys or feel the weight of the emotional stakes.
The show's structure, which moves between the past and present, introduces a compelling mystery about the hidden family and the tension between personal and professional lives. However, the emotional payoff of this storyline feels lacking, especially given the predictability of Nadia’s survival and the generic spy tropes that the show leans on. While the action sequences are a clear highlight, Honey Bunny occasionally falters in its writing.
The spy jargon and dialogue—often laden with clichés—can feel clunky and detract from the suspense. There is an attempt at humour, particularly through Honey’s character, who humorously acknowledges the awkwardness of her dialogue but this self-aware banter doesn't always land. Honey Bunny is an enjoyable, if imperfect, addition to the spy genre.
It’s a show that finds its strength in its unique cultural spin on the genre and its memorable action sequences, but it ultimately struggles to offer a compelling emotional core or deeper character exploration. While it’s fun to watch in the moment, its impact may not linger long after the credits roll. Rating: 2.
75/5.
